Featured Posts

WHY WE SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT THE GREECE DEBT CRISIS 


AMERICAN POLITICS: WHO'S RUNNING THE ASYLUM?



THE POWER AND THE PASSION


Worst Baby Names in the World


Celebrity Chefs


DARWIN’S THEORY OF YARD DUTY


THE ART OF THE COMPLAINT LETTER

CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF WORLD BAFFLES BELIEVERS


TEN EMERGENCY JOKES NO COMEDY WRITER SHOULD EVER BE WITHOUT


FROM TROTTER TO TWITTER: A BRIEF HISTORY OF HUMAN (MIS) COMMUNICATION


SEARCH

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« LANCE ARMSTRONG - JUST ANOTHER SCANDAL THAT IS RUINING SPORT | Main | Go Canadamerica! »
Friday
Jun242011

Wimbledon 2011: Remembering John Isner and Nicolas Mahut's 'endless match'

 

Today marks precisely one year since the most astonishing match in tennis history, a contest that will live long in the memory of anyone who witnessed any part of it.

When American 21st seed John Isner drew French qualifier Nicolas Mahut in the first round of the 2010 Wimbledon Championships, he must have expected a relatively easy passage through to the next stage. As the match entered its fifth set, however, the score remained at two sets each with Isner clawing back the fourth on a tie-break. At this point, he would just have been grateful to take the game into a second day as the players left the court due to fading light at 9.07pm.

The match resumed on Court 18 on Wednesday 23 June with a result that afternoon pretty much guaranteed… or so we would have thought. Isner and Mahut proceeded to play out a remarkable fifth set that would eventually span more than eight hours, seven of which took place on that second, groundbreaking day. Isner surpassed Ivo Karlovic’s record of 78 aces to take the final set to a quite astounding 39–38 on his way to an eventual 113 unreturnable serves. At 5.45pm, the match entered unforeseen territory, fast eclipsing the previous record of 6 hours 40 minutes.

At 47 games apiece, Wimbledon’s electronic scoreboard malfunctioned, first freezing before going completely blank. IBM programmers worked hard to fix the problem for the next day, ensuring the scoreboards could facilitate an additional 25 frames; should the fifth set have extended beyond 72 frames each, it would have malfunctioned once more.

As the light faded at Wimbledon, the two were still battling it out at 59–59. This contest would have to be continued on a third day, but would it reach a conclusion?

Isner and Mahut returned to court at 3.43pm on Thursday 24 June to an incredible reception. It took little over an hour for pre-match favourite Isner to consolidate on a broken serve and finally, after 11 hours and 5 minutes of play, the match had drawn to a conclusion at 6–4, 3–6, 6–7(7–9), 7–6(7–3), 70–68. The players, considerably fatigued, were each awarded a crystal bowl and champagne flutes on behalf of the All England Lawn Tennis Club, who also installed a commemorative plaque at Court 18.

It’s no surprise that a worse-for-wear Isner was annihilated in his second round match, which he lost in straight sets to Dutchman Thiemo de Bakker. But history shall remember the 2010 Wimbledon Championships for ‘the endless match’, perhaps more so than eventual victor Rafael Nadal. It will be a long, long time before we see anything even remotely similar, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the record stands for decades upon decades, maybe even centuries.

In a remarkable twist of fate, Isner and Mahut would once more be drawn together at the 2011 Wimbledon tournament, again in the first round, but the American completed a disappointingly clinical three set victory on a revamped Court 3. Well, did you expect anything more? There’s not much scope for an encore when your previous encounter lasted more than three days, two scoreboards, 50 bananas and six bottles of lemon and barley cordial. Probably.

Image courtesy Voo de Mar (CC2.0)

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
  • Response
    Response: showbox app
  • Response
    Response: www.gmail.com
  • Response
    Response: essay on time
    The result of the match that was played between the Isner and Nicolas were outstanding. This is one of the great matches that were ever played. The winner can be easily figure out by seeing the score board of it.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.